After the death of Saul, when David had returned from defeating the Amalekites, David remained two days in Ziklag.
David intoned this lamentation over Saul and his son Jonathan. (He ordered that The Song of the Bow be taught to the people of Judah; it is written in the Book of Jashar.) He said:
- Your glory, O Israel, lies slain upon your high places!
- How the mighty have fallen!
- Tell it not in Gath,
- proclaim it not in the streets of Ashkelon;
- or the daughters of the Philistines will rejoice,
- the daughters of the uncircumcised will exult.
- You mountains of Gilboa,
- let there be no dew or rain upon you,
- nor bounteous fields!
- For there the shield of the mighty was defiled,
- the shield of Saul, anointed with oil no more.
- From the blood of the slain,
- from the fat of the mighty,
- the bow of Jonathan did not turn back,
- nor the sword of Saul return empty.
- Saul and Jonathan, beloved and lovely!
- In life and in death they were not divided;
- they were swifter than eagles,
- they were stronger than lions.
- O daughters of Israel, weep over Saul,
- who clothed you with crimson, in luxury,
- who put ornaments of gold on your apparel.
- How the mighty have fallen
- in the midst of the battle!
- Jonathan lies slain upon your high places.
- I am distressed for you, my brother Jonathan;
- greatly beloved were you to me;
- your love to me was wonderful,
- passing the love of women.
- How the mighty have fallen,
- and the weapons of war perished!
Our Old Testament
lesson is David’s lament at the death of Jonathan and Saul. We can understand
David’s grief at the death of Jonathan: they had been close since their youth.
But what about Saul? For years, Saul had alternated between celebrating David and abusing him. He had threatened David’s life several times, and had driven him
into exile. Why this outpouring of grief for Saul, one of history’s most
difficult fathers-in-law?
Here’s part of the
answer: whatever else Saul was, headstrong, irrational, unfair, he was also
Yahweh’s anointed. In one version of the death of Saul, a young Amelekite, one
of Saul’s enemies, admits to David that he is the one who finished Saul off.
Instead of being rewarded, he is punished for “lifting his hand against the Lord’s
anointed.” Saul may not always have lived up to that high calling, but the
calling itself must be respected. Ultimately, Saul’s status as the one anointed
by God to govern Israel
is more important to David than the disagreements that arose between the two
men. Perhaps David is also beginning to realize just how difficult Saul’s
calling was. Power is now in David’s hands. Will he fare any better? Could
anyone?
Leadership is a
difficult role for any person to play. And how difficult the rest of us find
it to respect our leaders, to honor the office they fill, and at the same
time, have compassion on their human failings! All the more reason to respect
David’s passionate lament over Saul. All
the more reason to pray for our leaders, whether our opinions match theirs or
not!
2 Corinthians 8:7-15
- "The one who had much did not have too much,
- and the one who had little did not have too little."
The Corinthian
drama continues, perhaps towards a resolution! Paul and the Corinthian
Christians have been through a lot together. Paul has visited the city and
established a church. He has moved on, as was his custom, but in his absence he
has been undermined by “false prophets”, other teachers who questioned Paul’s
authority and teachings. Paul seems to have made another visit, which did not
go particularly well. He has written the Corinthians a very severe letter,
which seems to have found some traction: the Corinthians seem willing to accept
Paul’s status as a true apostle, and are willing to be guided by his teaching,
and his example.
With all that drama
out of the way, it is time to get back down to the business of everyday
faithful living. Before even setting out on the journey which took him to Corinth , Paul promised to raise funds for the Christians
in Jerusalem ,
who were suffering through a famine, and perhaps persecution. The Corinthians
had agreed to make a contribution to this cause, and now it’s time to honor
their pledge.
The combination of
high theology and sensible practicality we find in this part of the letter is
one hundred per cent Paul! We give, because giving in love is the true nature
of God, and we are called to honor the image of God, to display the image of God,
that dwells in us. We give because Christ has given to us; we give money,
remembering that in Christ, God has given us everything. That’s the high
theology.
“The one that has
much should not have too much; the one that has little should not have too
little.” That’s the sensible practicality. In a world where two thirds of the
people suffer health problems because they have too little to eat, and one
third of the people have health problems associated with eating too much, maybe
we have not got Paul’s simple equation right? There’s more at stake than just a
sense of fairness. Communities divided by huge gaps of wealth and opportunity
are inherently unstable: they tend to collapse under their own top-heavy
weight, or fall prey to violence. Paul is asking the Corinthians to narrow the
gap between themselves and the community in Jerusalem , for the sake of solidarity, to
keep the larger community healthy, and focused on its important task: proclaiming
the Good News.
Mark 5:21-43
Our gospel is a typical “Mark sandwich”: we start with one
story, get drawn into a second story, then finish up with the first story. Mark
does this quite a bit. It is a common strategy for people telling stories from
memory: embedding one story in another helps the story teller remember two
stories at once. Maybe this is a holdover from an earlier oral tradition?
Interesting.
In this case, the
arrangement of the stories is as important as their details. The two people
approaching Jesus are very different: Jairus is a respected, powerful, secure
member of society. His position as synagogue leader assures him of that. The
woman who touches Jesus is just the opposite. She is completely vulnerable: she
is ritually unclean, she is poor, and she is alone. More than that, she has
touched a man in public, which was bad news in any circumstances; to make
things worse, she has now made him ritually unclean as well. To top it all off,
that man is Jesus, who has become quite a celebrity. Surely she is in big
trouble.
But, as the
sandwich arrangement emphasizes, Jesus responds to their two requests equally.
In fact he stops what he is doing in order to establish personal contact with
the woman, not to chastise her, but to commend her faith. Clearly, Jesus’
ministry is going to cross all kinds of old boundaries, and upset all kinds of
old ideas about who counts as righteous, who is worthy of God’s love, who has a
place in the Kingdom. Mark makes sure we can see this, by telling us these two
stories together. The Kingdom
of God is as close to an
impure, isolated woman as it is to a respected, powerful rabbi.
Different as they
are, Jairus and the woman share one trait: they both recognize the authority of
Jesus (though perhaps out of desperation). Perhaps this is what Jesus responds
to. Perhaps trust counts for more than all the respectability in the
world.